Life offers many challenges and complexities. So, then, does the nonprofit sector in its effort to deal with what life presents. So, then, does the risk that nonprofits face in what they do.
Refusals. Being cut off in the middle of a conversation/phone call. Insults. And, with all that, pressure from above to show even better results.
Embracing ethical standards might seem like just a way of avoiding trouble, but taking an ethical stance is more than just keeping opponents at bay.
Offering a means for donors to give their money online is standard practice for most nonprofits, but many organizations fall into the trap of thinking that once “something” has been put on the Worldwide Web, then everything is copacetic.
Fundraisers are aware of the need for stewardship, but as Jennifer K. Pelton of Public Justice Center Maryland (PJCM) said, they should not get so hung up on stewardship mode that they forget to ask for something once in a while.
When examining information on funders, you’ll often see phrases such as “gives to pre-selected organizations only” or “does not accept unsolicited proposals.” These signal that the funder selects its grantees using an internal process that does not include reviewing applications.
So much of fundraising means telling the story that the method of doing that telling is of increasing importance.
As if managing a nonprofit isn’t risky enough, sometimes it is necessary to hire an employee — and to check that employee’s references.
Nonprofit organizations start because someone has a vision for some kind of change. Very often, it is literally one person who has that vision. That can be a good thing if a charismatic individual can rally allies and money enough to make a difference.
Ever walk into a room and forget why you went in there? It helps to write things down, sometimes even the simple things.
Current Print Edition
July 1, 2015Table Of Contents
Volume 29 No. 8
In The News