It doesn’t have to be volunteer vs. volunteer

June 26, 2015       The NonProfit Times      

Nonprofits are nonprofits, volunteers are volunteers, all is well, right?

Well, maybe not.

As Susan J. Ellis, a nonprofit consultant who specializes in volunteer management has noted, there can be a difference between volunteer-involving organizations (VIO), which utilize both paid staff and volunteers, and all-volunteer organizations (AVO), which are just what the name implies.

In an ideal world, such differing organizations would be able to work together seamlessly and painlessly for a common goal. As anyone who has been paying attention might have noticed, we live in something other than a perfect world. That is why, Ellis says, VIOs and AVOs can sometimes have trouble when trying to collaborate.

Ellis explains the challenges to collaboration thusly:

  • The thorny problem of ownership and who gets credit are always at play in any collaboration.
  • AVOs desire independent visibility. To begin with, many nonprofits are not necessarily collaborating with each other, and it is possible for a feeling of competitiveness to exist all around.
  • Many AVOs do not have a physical base of operations, as VIOs always do. A lack of continuity can make it hard to maintain communication.
  • The officers of AVOs do not identify with volunteer management itself, and their skills can be overlooked by managers of VIOs.
  • Most volunteers who lead other volunteers rarely think about their work in this context. They have primary careers in different fields and do voluntary leadership in their discretionary time.
NonProfit  Times
The Leading Business Publication For Nonprofit Management